Why South Asia Needs a Regional Cyber Accord?

Md. Saiful Islam Shanto | 25 March 2026
No image

The escalating frequency of cyber operations in South Asia demonstrates a severe deficit in infrastructure defense. In March 2026, an advanced threat group known as "Sloppy Lemming" successfully breached the Power Grid Company of Bangladesh, Pakistani telecommunications infrastructure, and Sri Lankan government networks. This pattern of targeting essential civilian services is supported by prior data. In May 2025, the Power Grid Corporation of India experienced a major infrastructure breach, followed by targeted ransomware campaigns that rendered hospital servers in Delhi inoperable.

South Asia is currently undergoing rapid digital transformation, driven by national frameworks such as "Digital India" and "Smart Bangladesh 2041." However, this developmental trajectory contains a critical structural flaw: the digitization of essential sectors, including finance, healthcare, and energy is vastly outpacing the implementation of corresponding cybersecurity frameworks. This disparity creates a highly asymmetric threat landscape. Non-state actors or small, well-equipped syndicates can now inflict levels of national disruption previously limited to conventional military strikes. To safeguard civilian infrastructure and prevent digital incursions from escalating into physical conflicts, South Asian states must urgently formalize a Regional Cyber Accord.

Compounding this vulnerability is the region's volatile geopolitical environment. South Asian states frequently operate within the "grey zone", conducting hostile operations that remain purposefully below the threshold of declared warfare. Cyber operations are increasingly the primary instrument for these tactics due to their low cost, high impact, and plausible deniability. Yet, this strategy carries severe risks of miscalculation. If a state-aligned actor inadvertently disables a critical civilian asset, such as a medical network or energy grid, during heightened political tensions, the targeted state may interpret the disruption as a kinetic attack. In a region comprising nuclear-armed powers, such inadvertent escalation poses an immediate threat to global strategic stability.

At present, there are no established regional protocols to mitigate this risk. Institutional integration in South Asia remains fundamentally weak, with bodies like the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) persistently paralyzed by bilateral political deadlocks. Consequently, states are attempting to manage a transnational threat through isolated, unilateral defense postures. This fragmented strategy is inherently unsustainable. Cyber threats bypass physical borders, necessitating a defense architecture that does the same. A pragmatic, cohesive regional policy is essential to navigate the digital security challenges of the coming decade.

The foundational component of this policy must be a comprehensive South Asian Cyber Accord. This multilateral treaty would explicitly codify civilian critical infrastructure, specifically medical facilities, water management systems, and energy distribution networks, as prohibited targets for state-sponsored digital interference. Establishing this unambiguous regional "red line" will create a crucial operational buffer to prevent accidental military escalation.

Furthermore, the accord must mandate the creation of an apolitical Cyber Threat Intelligence Sharing Hub. Currently, transnational ransomware syndicates and non-state actors capitalize on the informational silos existing between South Asian security agencies. A centralized, technical hub would enable experts across Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and neighboring states to exchange real-time intelligence regarding malware signatures, network vulnerabilities, and threat vectors. For instance, if an advanced persistent threat targets an Indian technology firm, the hub would facilitate immediate alerts allowing networks in Nepal and the Maldives to implement defensive patches. Reframing cybercrime from a classified state secret to a mutual regional hazard is critical to neutralizing these syndicates. 

Skeptics will invariably highlight the historical mistrust between South Asian administrations as a barrier to intelligence sharing. While this assessment is accurate, it can be bypassed by restructuring the intelligence apparatus. The proposed hub must operate autonomously from traditional defense or political ministries. By utilizing multilateral financial institutions, such as the Asian Development Bank, to sponsor and moderate the facility, participating states can ensure that cross-border cooperation remains strictly technical, neutral, and exclusively dedicated to civilian defense.

So, accelerating digital infrastructure without proportional defensive capabilities constitutes a severe strategic liability. A successful cyber intrusion extends far beyond data theft; it can incapacitate public utilities, suspend emergency responses, and paralyze economic output. As South Asia advances its digital integration, cybersecurity must transition from a secondary concern to a primary strategic directive. Implementing a Regional Cyber Accord transcends basic technology policy; it represents a foundational prerequisite for sustained regional stability and security in the twenty-first century.

•    Md. Saiful Islam Shanto is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Governance Studies (CGS)

Disclaimer: Views in this article are author’s own and do not necessarily reflect CGS policy




Comments