CGS
  • VLOG
  • PODCAST
  • FORUMS
  • PROJECTS
  • CONTACT US
  • Home
  • ABOUT CGS
    • Who We Are
    • Board of Directors
    • Board of Advisors
    • International Advisors
    • Team
  • RESEARCH
    • Research
    • Surveys
  • EVENTS
    • Seminars
    • Dialogue
    • Public Lectures
    • Workshops
    • Roundtable Meetings
    • Upcoming Events
    • Meet the Ambassador
    • In Conversation
  • ALLIES
    • Partners
    • Supporters
  • PROGRAM
    • Training
    • Courses
    • Issues
  • TRENDING
  • PUBLICATIONS
    • Journal
      • Description
      • Call For Papers
      • Editorial Board
      • Advisory Board
    • Books
    • Newsletter
      • Clips
      • Indo-Pacific Insights
      • Foreign Policy Review
    • Reports
      • White Paper
      • First Published
      • Republished
      • Working Papers
      • Occasional Papers
      • Policy Papers
      • Policy Briefs
      • Policy Reports
      • Issue Brief
    • Global Up-to-Date
    • Handbook
  • PRESS
    • Releases & Statements
    • CGS in Print Media
    • CGS in Electronic Media
    • Video
    • Photo
    • Op-ed & Interviews
    • Investigative Reports
    • Media Enquiries
  • CAREER
    • Job
    • Internship
    • Fellowship
  • Home
  • American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective

American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective

23 February 2022
No image


Book Review
Noam Gidron, James Adams, Will Horne: American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020

The extent of partisanship in the United States of America (USA) is not greater than in other high-income peer countries like the United Kingdom (UK), Australia, and New Zealand, and it's worse in Spain, Portugal, and Greece. The authors measure partisanship as the gap between how you view the party you support and the party you oppose, based on survey data going back to 1996. By this measure, partisanship in the USA has gotten worse faster than in other countries. 

The main drivers of partisanship are divides on cultural issues like immigration, abortion, and race. Levels of unemployment and inequality are also factors. While cultural issues drive partisanship, this has a positive side since the disputes arise because disadvantaged groups are getting more recognition and rights protected. The alternative would be continuing the suppression of these groups. The authors also find that moving from majority to proportional systems isn't a panacea for polarization. While the latter encourages populist radical parties, populist factions can still take over a major party in majority systems, as happened with Trump.

The authors point out many areas for future research to expand their findings. In addition to the many valuable areas they highlight, I would like to interrogate the conclusion that economic issues are less critical in driving partisanship. One reason not discussed here is that a narrative has been crafted starting in the USA and UK and then in other countries that government is the problem, and we need less of it and more private sector-like practices in the public sphere. This storyline supports the view that CEOs paid hundreds of times more than their other workers are worth the money and should continue their excellent work (and tax dodging). This is a self-serving narrative supported by elites and their minions. It's time for an alternative narrative and a more balanced storyline describing the close collaboration between business and government and how both have roles in building a just and prosperous society. Enterprises have become too focused on serving top managers and shareholders and need to support broader social values.

Finally, the continents of North and South America encompass a wide variety of countries, cultures, and languages. Therefore, the authors should know better than to use America as a synonym for the USA.

Clay Wescott, President, International Public Management Network and member of International Advisory Board at Centre for Governance Studies (CGS)


More about : Backsliding (Elements in Political Economy) | The Decline and Rise of Democracy: A Global History from Antiquity to Today | An Internal Matter: The US, Grassroots Activism, and the Creation of Bangladesh | COVID-19 and Governance: Crisis Reveals | The Code Breaker: Jennifer Doudna, Gene Editing, and the Future of the Human Race

Comments

Related Posts

India’s Deadly War on Naxalites and Adivasis in Chhattisgarh
04 August 2025
Asim Munir’s Promotion to Field Marshal Signals an Authoritarian Pakistan
29 July 2025
Lesson From Op Sindoor: To Truly Win, India Must Tone Down its Public Trumpeting
02 July 2025
Overshadowed by Border Dispute, India-Pakistan Water Security Risks Grow
17 June 2025
Why are Bangladeshis Turning Against India?
26 May 2025
India and Pakistan Have Agreed A Precarious Peace – But Will It Last?
19 May 2025
The Cost of War
08 May 2025
India Shouldn’t Weaponize Water in Fight with Pakistan
29 April 2025
The Leadership Deficit
23 April 2025
Failure of Afghan Policy
20 April 2025
With The Waqf Bill, The State Brings A Legal Bulldozer to Minority Rights
07 April 2025
Countering Insurgency
23 March 2025
Missing Local Government
10 March 2025
Sri Lanka: National People’s Power and The Path Back to Democracy
03 February 2025
Can A Ceasefire End Settler Colonial Genocide?
20 January 2025
ADDRESS
45/1 New Eskaton, 2nd Floor Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
Email: ed@cgs-bd.com
Phone: +880258310217, +880248317902,
+8802222223109
Telegram No: +8801819890136
CATEGORY
  • Research
  • Seminars
  • Internship
  • Issues
Photo Gallery
© 2025 - Centre for Governance Studies. All Rights Reserved. Designed & Developed by Real Technologies Limited